Historical Testing

How Well Did MakeItBy's Estimates Match Historical Results?

MakeItBy estimates the chance that each scheduled flight arrives by your deadline. We tested those estimates across historical flight comparisons, then checked how reliability changed as scheduled arrival times moved closer to the deadline.

96%

A Real Tradeoff in Most Tests

Most Historical Comparisons Involved a Real Tradeoff.

Across 467,652 simulated historical comparison scenarios, about 96% left more than one flight worth considering. In the other 4%, the latest scheduled flight was also at least as reliable as every earlier choice.

5h 18m average gap between the earliest and latest scheduled arrivals
9.6 percentage points average spread in estimated deadline reliability across the flights compared
Estimated: 94% · Observed: 95% estimated versus observed deadline success for the leading choices
These are historical tests, not a forecast for your next flight. Current weather, air-traffic restrictions, maintenance, gate changes, and other day-of-travel conditions are not part of these estimates.

Tradeoff Structure

Most Historical Comparisons Had More Than One Competitive Flight.

In most tests, no single flight was both scheduled to arrive later and at least as reliable as every other option. That means the choice depended on how much scheduled arrival convenience the traveler was willing to trade for deadline reliability.

How Often Was There a Real Tradeoff?

Share of simulated historical comparisons

96% had more than one reasonable option
4% had one clear latest option

These were simulated historical comparison scenarios, not 467,652 unique travelers. The historical test used every flight in each tested route and arrival window. The live product is narrower: it compares only the flights you enter.

Estimates vs. Outcomes

The Estimates Stayed Close to What Actually Happened.

If the model says a group of comparable flights has about 94% deadline reliability, historical calibration asks whether roughly 94% of those flights actually made the deadline.

Flight group Estimated Observed
Earliest scheduled choice 98.1% 98.2%
Tradeoff choices 94.4% 95.0%
Latest scheduled choice 88.6% 89.5%

Historical calibration does not guarantee a future result.

Simple Buffer Comparison

Model-Based Rules Often Identified Later Flights With Similar Historical Deadline Success.

We compared model-based reliability thresholds with simple rules such as “take the latest flight with at least three hours of scheduled buffer.” A 96% reliability target, for example, means choosing the latest flight whose estimated chance of making the deadline was at least 96%. The examples below include only historical scenarios where both rules could choose a flight.

95% reliability target vs. 2.5-hour buffer About 35 minutes later

scheduled arrival

About 2.0 additional deadline misses per 1,000 historical comparisons.

96% reliability target vs. 3-hour buffer About 39 minutes later

scheduled arrival

About 0.6 additional deadline misses per 1,000 historical comparisons.

97% reliability target vs. 4-hour buffer About 59 minutes later

scheduled arrival

About 1.1 additional deadline misses per 1,000 historical comparisons.

These reliability targets are evaluation settings, not MakeItBy recommendation settings. The product does not choose how much reliability you should trade for a later scheduled arrival.

Stability

The Same Pattern Appeared Across All Tested Dates, Lead Times, Deadlines, and Window Lengths.

In the 96% reliability target versus a three-hour buffer, the model-based rule allowed a later scheduled arrival in every test date, booking lead time, arrival deadline, and comparison-window length we checked.

6 of 6 test dates 18.6 to 81.9 minutes later
4 of 4 lead times 38.2 to 38.9 minutes later
3 of 3 deadlines 20.4 to 69.2 minutes later
3 of 3 window lengths 34.4 to 42.5 minutes later

Later Scheduled Arrival Does Not Mean Better in Every Test.

Historical deadline success sometimes favored the simple buffer rule and sometimes the model-based test. The consistent result was a later scheduled arrival with only a small difference in observed deadline success.

Test Method

We Rebuilt Each Historical Flight Set Before Checking the Outcomes.

1

Use Only Information Available at the Time

The model used only historical records that would have been available before the simulated trip. Actual delays and other future information were excluded.

2

Rebuild the Tested Flight Set

Every historical flight in the tested route and arrival window was retained before the model-based and simple-buffer comparisons were evaluated.

3

Compare With What Actually Happened

We checked whether each selected historical flight actually reached its scheduled destination by the simulated deadline, including cancellations and diversions as failures.

33.0 millionhistorical flight operations in the validated dataset
Jan 2022–Jun 2026historical data period
50 states + DCU.S. domestic nonstop scope

Model Development

We Compared Five Model Families Before Choosing the Production Approach.

We compared five model families on forecast accuracy, calibration, stability, and decision behavior. The final approach had the strongest overall forecast accuracy, and no alternative showed a clear enough product-level advantage to replace it.

Model families tested 5
Training examples 6.6 million
Data through June 2026

Limitations

Historical Reliability Is Useful Evidence, Not a Guarantee.

The Live Comparison Is Limited to the Flights You Enter

MakeItBy does not claim to search every scheduled flight at launch. It resolves and compares the candidate flights you provide.

Schedules Can Change

The historical model does not include the chance that a future published schedule is later retimed, removed, or assigned to a different operation.

Day-of-Travel Conditions Still Matter

Weather, air traffic, maintenance, and other current operational conditions can change what happens after the comparison is made.

24-Hour Comparison Limit: MakeItBy only scores submitted flights scheduled to arrive from the deadline itself back through 24 hours before it. Flights outside that window are not part of the supported launch comparison.
One Important Testing Limitation: the historical comparison reconstructed final schedules from U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics records. It could not reproduce the exact future schedule a traveler would have seen months before departure.

For a cruise with a fixed boarding deadline, see how to calculate your airport-arrival deadline before comparing your flights.

For a separate descriptive comparison of historical flight outcomes, see July vs. October Flight Reliability. That analysis is not a test of MakeItBy's predicted probabilities.